Water Online

October 2013

Water Online the Magazine gives Water & Wastewater Engineers and end-users a venue to find project solutions and source valuable product information. We aim to educate the engineering and operations community on important issues and trends.

Issue link: http://wateronline.epubxp.com/i/164223

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 25 of 50

pu re str ea mpa r ts. com Purestream, Inc. presents an online marketplace for replacement parts for your WWTP! As one might suspect, adjusting to new NPDES guidelines is not always simple or inexpensive. issues with the technology in actual application. These include: • • Some standard cooling tower chemicals may foul the UF membranes. ° The membrane manufacturer and type greatly influence this phenomenon. ° Use of upstream multimedia filters to help remove the chemicals may be completely ineffective. Use of poor-quality backwash water for the UF membranes may result in scaling of the effluent surface of the membranes. Sign up with us today, make your first purchase and then receive a 12% discount on every future purchase! pu re str ea mpa r ts. com Even when the system outlined in Figure 2 operates steadily, a waste stream still remains and must be disposed. Potential solutions include: • • • • Deep well injection Evaporation pond(s) Thermal evaporation/crystallization Have the material transported off-site to a waste disposal firm Any of these techniques may be easier said than done. Deep-well injection and evaporation ponds require environmental evaluations and the required permits before implementation. Permission may not be granted. Also, deep-well injection has its own set of technical issues, including the need to pump the material at high pressure into the well(s) and the possibility of scale formation within the well casing, particularly as temperatures increase deeper underground. Thermal evaporation/crystallization is a proven technology, but these systems typically require a significant amount of energy, plus they can be labor- and maintenance-intensive. Some plant personnel have thus opted for the last option on the above list and have installed a large-capacity storage tank from which the wastewater can be trucked to a disposal facility. The upshot of this discussion is that plant personnel are facing tighter restrictions on waste stream discharges (include air in this category) and thus will have to plan accordingly. References 1. B. Buecker, "Cooling Towers: Modern Concepts"; Energy-Tech, April 2013. 2. Buecker, B., Post, R., P.E., and R. Aull, P.E., "Chemical Treatment and Fill Selection Methods to Minimize Scaling/Fouling in Cooling Towers"; from the Proceedings of the 72nd Annual International Water Conference, November 13-17, 2011, Orlando, Florida. We have been the leader in the package wastewater treatment plant field for over 40 years. Contact us today for sales representation opportunities that may be available in your area. CALL US TODAY AT (859) 371 9898 Brad Buecker is a process specialist with Kiewit Power Engineers in Lenexa, KS. He has 32 years of direct and consulting experience to the power industry in the areas of water treatment, steam generation chemistry, and air pollution control. wateronline.com ■ Water Online The Magazine OR EMAIL purestream@purestreaminc.com LEARN MORE ABOUT US AT www.purestreaminc.com 21

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Water Online - October 2013