Water Online

JAN 2016

Water Innovations gives Water and Wastewater Engineers and end-users a venue to find project solutions and source valuable product information. We aim to educate the engineering and operations community on important issues and trends.

Issue link: http://wateronline.epubxp.com/i/628452

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 15 of 42

And the reality is that unmanaged water loss is the most expensive kind there is. One-hundred-percent of water systems have a water loss program. When leaks show up, we fix them. When meters stop, we replace them. When we see people stealing water, we fine them. But few systems have a proactive water loss program, seeking out these issues before they happen, based on a sound business case for action. If we wait for issues to find us, we are overspending. It may not feel like it — because the cost of no action is embedded — but it is there. And just as every system has water loss, every system has an economically optimum level of water loss. Reactive programs will not get us to this economic optimum. The gap between our water loss today and our economic optimum represents our business case for action — and the business case against no action. The tipping point brings a mainstream awareness of these issues and pushes the methods and tools forward for solving our hidden problems. Tomorrow's Toolbox Sectorization of pipe networks into leakage management zones, commonly known as district metered areas (DMAs), is certainly an established practice around the world. There are some utilities in the U.S. that have been employing this practice for many years. On the whole, however, DMAs are not an established practice in the U.S. But this is changing. Utilities without DMAs are leveraging existing pressure zone configurations as a foray into leakage management zones. 7 And utilities with DMAs are pushing the boundaries of technology to achieve one-man step testing and pushing the boundaries of the technical minimum leakage levels. 8 DMAs represent a tool in the toolbox for leakage management. Like acoustic leak surveys, DMAs fall under "active leakage control" — proactively localizing, pinpointing, and repairing leaks before they find you. Another underutilized tool in the leakage toolbox that is beginning to take hold in the U.S. is pressure optimization. Traditionally, our pipe networks have been designed with full consideration for the occurrence of minimum pressures but little or no consideration for the occurrence of maximum pressures. The relationship between lower pressures and lower leakage rates has been well understood for nearly two decades. More recently, the relationship between lower pressure and fewer breaks has become well understood. Beyond these very tangible benefits, the impacts of pressure on energy costs and pipe replacement costs are now coming into full view. Just as with the car we drive, how we operate our water networks has a direct impact on operating costs and the effective life of the pipes. It turns out that these impacts, when aggregated, can be tremendous. Utilities and even state agencies 9 are beginning to recognize the potential in these advanced optimization practices. On the revenue side, some interesting case studies are emerging where utilities are moving to optimize revenue losses on their large customer meter populations. Conventional wisdom 10 suggests a large meter testing should be dictated by meter size. Utilities are beginning to employ a benefit-cost approach 11 to these programs, looking at the probable gain based on consumptive revenue and how this stacks up against testing and remediation costs. What they are seeing from this is a meter-specific testing plan that identifies which of their nonresidential meters are economically justified for testing very often and which should not be tested at all. And the results are compelling. What will 2016 bring? Web traffic statistics tracked by AWWA 12 support what we are generally observing in the media and at conference events: The issue of water loss is mainstreaming. With this comes a broader adoption of entry-level practices — standard AWWA water auditing. But it also brings the continued adoption and innovation of advanced practices for leakage and revenue management that propel the industry forward. n wateronline.com n Water Innovations Will Jernigan, PE, is a director with Cavanaugh and a nationally recognized leader in water loss management and bioenergy. Will has 15 years in the industry, and is active with AWWA in several ways, including vice chair of the AWWA Water Loss Control Committee, principle author on the M36 Manual for Water Loss Control, 4th Edition, chair of the inaugural North American Water Loss Conference (December 2015 in Atlanta), and member of the IWA Water Loss Specialist Group. About The Author 13 WATERLOSS Flow analysis from DMA gives immediate alert for main break (Credit: Water & Wastewater Authority of Wilson County) 1. Senate Bill 555, signed October 9th, 2015. 2. Colorado Water Wise M36 training program – http://coloradowaterwise. org/WaterLossAuditTraining 3. New Mexico Environment Department Water Loss Training Program – https://southwestefc.unm.edu/waterloss/registration.html 4. Wisconsin Water Association & Public Services Commission – Pilot Water Loss Training – Sept 2015 – Feb 2016. 5. Oklahoma DEQ – Pilot Water Audit Program Presentation. Proceedings from ASDWA Annual Conference 2015, Fort Worth, TX. 6. EPA Clean Power Plan – http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/sustain/ener- gyefficiency.cfm 7. City of Asheville, NC – Case Study Presentation. Proceedings from AWWA Water Infrastructure Conference 2014, Atlanta, GA. 8. Water & Wastewater Authority of Wilson County – Case Study Presenta- tion. Proceedings from AWWA Annual Conference 2015, Anaheim, CA. 9. Georgia Environmental Finance Authority – Water Loss Technical Assis- tance Program including DMAs & Pressure Optimization – 2015-2016 10. AWWA M6 Manual – Water Meters-Selection, Installation, Testing & Maintenance. 11. New York City DEP and Asheville, NC – Large Meter Economic Opti- mization Program. Proceedings from the North American Water Loss 2015, Atlanta, GA. 12. Minutes from AWWA Water Loss Control Committee meeting, October 2015, Bethesda, MD.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Water Online - JAN 2016