wateronline.com
■
Water Online The Magazine
101 Gibraltar Road, Suite 100
Horsham, PA 19044
PH: (215) 675-1800
FX: (215) 675-4880
Email: info@wateronline.com
Website: www.wateronline.com
CHIEF EDITOR
Kevin Westerling
(215) 675-1800 ext. 120
kwesterling@vertmarkets.com
EDITOR
Laura Martin
(215) 675-1800 ext. 124
lmartin@vertmarkets.com
PUBLISHER
Travis Kennedy
(215) 675-1800 ext. 122
tkennedy@vertmarkets.com
ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER
Patrick Gallagher
(215) 675-1800 ext. 129
pgallagher@vertmarkets.com
PRODUCT MANAGER
Bill King
(215) 675-1800 ext. 100
bking@vertmarkets.com
MANAGING EDITOR
Michael Thiemann
(814) 897-9000, ext. 340
michael.thiemann@jamesonpublishing.com
PRODUCTION DIRECTOR
Dianna Gross
(814) 897-9000, ext. 255
dianna.gross@jamesonpublishing.com
DIRECTOR OF AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT
Martin Zapolski
(814) 897-7700, ext. 337
martinz@jamesonpublishing.com
DIRECTOR OF ONLINE DEVELOPMENT
Art Glenn
art.glenn@jamesonpublishing.com
Reprints, Eprints, and NXTprints
The YGS Group (800) 290-5460
VertMarketsReprints@theYGSgroup.com
www.theYGSgroup.com
ADDRESS CORRECTIONS
Send to Water Online at above address,
or email circ@vertmarkets.com.
Please give old and new address,
and enclose or reference your
latest mailing label.
Copyright © 2014, VertMarkets, Inc.
Size Matters At EPA
The U.S. EPA seems to have a size issue. The agency plays a
tremendously important role in protecting the environment and has
a strong historical track record, but the scope of the job, coupled
with the agency's own ambitions, has progressed to the point that
the EPA may be too small to get the job done effectively.
Some may scoff at that notion, seeing the EPA as another bloated
government entity plagued by inefficiencies and decisions made
from ivory towers — essentially, the typical arguments against "big
government." That perception is not without some merit; I'm cer-
tain there are countless frustrations among water and wastewater professionals at every level,
pointing to policies and procedures that don't work on a practical level. "Get out of the way,"
is the rallying cry.
I would argue, however, that the EPA needs to be more present than ever considering the
escalating threats to water quality and supply such as hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"), climate
change, and a host of contaminants emerging from agricultural and industrial processes.
The recent and still-surging growth
of fracking has overwhelmed the EPA,
according to the federal Government
Accountability Office (GAO). In a
June 2014 report, the GAO concluded
that "[the] EPA is not consistently con-
ducting [key] oversight and enforcement
activities for class II programs" — a class
that includes fracking wells. The report further stated that "[the] EPA does not consistently
conduct annual on-site state program evaluations as directed in guidance because, according
to some EPA officials, the agency does not have the resources to do so."
The GAO also criticized the EPA in a September 2014 report on the lax handling of hazard-
ous chemical discharges. The EPA hasn't updated i ts list of regulated "priority pollutants" since
1981; meanwhile, a cocktail of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and other byproducts
of industrial manufacturing has been passed unchecked through wastewater treatment plants
and into waterways. As with fracking, the GAO cites a lack of resources as the reason.
EPA Agenda
Despite being shorthanded and missing goals, the EPA hasn't slowed its ambition. In fact, the
agency is taking on more responsibilities.
One of the latest (and most controversial) initiatives is the expansion of the "Waters of the
United States" that fall under EPA's jurisdiction. The EPA wants to regulate more waterways,
much to the dismay of many farmers, businesses, and residential landowners. Critics call it
overreach, while the EPA claims expansion is necessary to maintain and improve water qual-
ity. Overreach or not, it is still the EPA trying to do more when the GAO says it is already
undermanned.
The EPA also recently finalized its Climate Change Adaptation Plan, published on
October 31, 2014, which details 10 agency-wide priorities to be implemented for new projects
across the nation, designed to ensure "adaptive capacity" — readiness and resiliency — in
preparation for climate change impacts. Part of that task is the ongoing monitoring and evalua-
tion of the implementation plan to be developed by each EPA program (e.g., Office of Water),
regional office, and partner. To me, it sounds like yet another labor-intensive endeavor.
Consider these factors together, and it appears the EPA is not too big at all but rather too
small. Granted, the agency may be able to handle all of its chores by improving efficiency and
changing procedures — in so doing, perhaps curtailing some
"big government" characteristics and complaints — but in the
absence of such changes, growing environmental threats and
EPA initiatives seem to suggest that the EPA is destined to fall
short of its lofty goals.
Kevin Westerling
Chief Editor
editor@wateronline.com
Editor's Letter
3
Despite being shorthanded and
missing goals, the EPA hasn't slowed
its ambition. In fact, the agency is
taking on more responsibilities.