Water Online

December 2014

Water Online the Magazine gives Water & Wastewater Engineers and end-users a venue to find project solutions and source valuable product information. We aim to educate the engineering and operations community on important issues and trends.

Issue link: http://wateronline.epubxp.com/i/426767

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 22 of 24

wateronline.com ■ Water Online The Magazine Detection Of Chromium In Drinking Water Chromium can be accurately measured to sub-part per billion concentrations using widely available analytical techniques. Total chromium concentrations are determined by inductively coupled plasma — mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) per EPA Method 200.8. Hexavalent chromium is measured by ion chromatography followed by spectroscopic detection per EPA Method 218.7. There is no accepted method for direct measurement of Cr(III). Instead, Cr(III) concentrations are calculated by difference, subtracting the Cr(VI) concentration from the Cr(tot) concentration. Technologies For The Treatment Of Chromium In Drinking Water Currently few utilities in the U.S. operate a full-scale treatment system specifically designed to remove Cr(VI) from drinking water. However, there have been a number of bench and pilot level studies evaluating chromium treatment technologies. Based on the results of these studies, there are four Cr(VI) treatment technologies capable of meeting California's 10 µg/L MCL: • Strong base anion exchange (SBA) • Weak base anion exchange (WBA) • Nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes (NF/RO) • Reduction/coagulation/filtration (RCF). NF/RO membranes remove Cr(VI) by forcing contaminated water under pressure through a semi- permeable membrane. Hexavalent chromium, along with other dissolved contaminants, is retained by the membrane through a combination of size exclusion and electrostatic repulsion effects. Depending on the specific design of the membrane, rejection of up to 95 percent of Cr(VI) is possible. As with all NF/RO systems, they are hydraulically inefficient. A typical recovery (the ratio of water produced to water treated) is 75 to 80 percent. Hence, membrane systems are undesirable in arid sections of the country where water resources are scarce. In addition, disposal of the Regulatory Analysis 20

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Water Online - December 2014